Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563013›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Why do AI projects fail in drug development and pharma? Insights from multi-year Pistoia Alliance studies.

Vladimir A Makarov, Mario Sänger, Roman Saiz, Matthias Hartung, Nick Lynch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vladimir A MakarovPistoia Alliance Inc., 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 600, Wakefield, MA, 01880, USA. vladimir.makarov@pistoiaalliance.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8218-1145
Mario SängerEnterprise AI Platforms & Services, AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-2587
Roman SaizRoche, Weil Am Rhein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Matthias HartungBoehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6549-066X
Nick LynchCurlew Research, Woburn Sands, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8997-5298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly central role in drug discovery and the pharmaceutical industry more broadly. However, despite some high-profile success stories, many technically successful pilots do not translate into sustained business value. In this study, we analyze the determinants of successful AI adoption in the life sciences through three complementary approaches: (i) brainstorming workshops with senior industry professionals, (ii) a global executive survey, and (iii) a statistical analysis of a collection of AI/ML use cases collected by the Pistoia Alliance. Across all methods, a consistent pattern emerges: high strategic importance and demand for AI contrast with low organizational maturity, resulting in limited success rates for production deployments. Statistical analysis reveals that business success is associated with dimensions of organizational capability maturity, most notably project maturity, while technical factors such as data sources or model types show no significant association on their own. The findings reinforce that AI projects follow the same success drivers as other complex engineering initiatives and that organizational readiness, change management, and alignment between stakeholders are critical. Furthermore, trustworthiness encompassing reproducibility, explainability, and governance, is identified as a limiting factor for adoption, particularly in high-risk domains. We synthesize these observations into a set of recommended practices that emphasize fitness-for-purpose method selection, integration of AI into human workflows, and development of shared standards.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryHumansArtificial intelligenceDrug discoveryGood machine learning practicesGovernanceOrganizational maturity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.