Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563007›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026

Pre-therapeutic prediction of cachexia in lymphoma patients using [

Yang Jiang, Mouqing Huang, Yufei Zhao, Jingyue Dai, Xingzhe Tang, Ying Cui, Lin Fu, Wenjun Yang, Xinyi Chen, Yuqing Lan and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yang JiangNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-7098
Mouqing HuangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8080-0057
Yufei ZhaoNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4795-519X
Jingyue DaiNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-8562
Xingzhe TangNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1161-3824
Ying CuiNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-5275
Lin FuNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9964-6983
Wenjun YangNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1160-6160
Xinyi ChenNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-4972
Yuqing LanNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7712-0455
Zihui ZhaoNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4227-774X
Xin-Gui PengNurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. xingui2005peng@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2988-5984

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82272064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCachexia adversely affects treatment outcomes in patients with lymphoma, highlighting the need for early risk identification. This study aimed to develop a predictive model using [¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics features to identify lymphoma patients at risk of developing cachexia.

methodsA total of 150 lymphoma patients who underwent pre-treatment [¹⁸F]FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled from two centers and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from metabolic tissues, including the liver, visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, psoas muscle, and sacrospinal muscle. Three models were constructed: radiomics, clinical, and a combined model integrating both. Model performance was evaluated using area under curve (AUC) and AUCs were compared using DeLong's test.

resultsIn the training cohort, 61 of 105 patients developed cachexia; in the testing cohort (n = 45), 26 developed cachexia. The radiomics model incorporated five features from subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, and psoas muscle. The combined model, incorporating radiomics and clinical features, achieved an AUC of 0.916 in the training cohort, significantly outperforming the clinical (AUC = 0.844; P = 0.013) and radiomics (AUC = 0.826; P = 0.005) models. In the testing cohort, the radiomics (AUC = 0.816; P = 0.040) and combined (AUC = 0.759; P = 0.003) models significantly outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.601).

conclusionRadiomics features from [¹⁸F]FDG PET images of visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, and the psoas muscle may effectively identify lymphoma patients at high risk of developing cachexia.

Identifiers

PMID42563007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.