ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Pre-therapeutic prediction of cachexia in lymphoma patients using [
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCachexia adversely affects treatment outcomes in patients with lymphoma, highlighting the need for early risk identification. This study aimed to develop a predictive model using [¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics features to identify lymphoma patients at risk of developing cachexia.
methodsA total of 150 lymphoma patients who underwent pre-treatment [¹⁸F]FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled from two centers and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from metabolic tissues, including the liver, visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, psoas muscle, and sacrospinal muscle. Three models were constructed: radiomics, clinical, and a combined model integrating both. Model performance was evaluated using area under curve (AUC) and AUCs were compared using DeLong's test.
resultsIn the training cohort, 61 of 105 patients developed cachexia; in the testing cohort (n = 45), 26 developed cachexia. The radiomics model incorporated five features from subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, and psoas muscle. The combined model, incorporating radiomics and clinical features, achieved an AUC of 0.916 in the training cohort, significantly outperforming the clinical (AUC = 0.844; P = 0.013) and radiomics (AUC = 0.826; P = 0.005) models. In the testing cohort, the radiomics (AUC = 0.816; P = 0.040) and combined (AUC = 0.759; P = 0.003) models significantly outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.601).
conclusionRadiomics features from [¹⁸F]FDG PET images of visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, and the psoas muscle may effectively identify lymphoma patients at high risk of developing cachexia.
Identifiers
42563007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.