ArticleGene therapy2026
Precision correction of the GJB2 c.235delC mutation by prime editing in vitro.
Article in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary hearing loss, predominantly attributed to mutations in the GJB2 gene, constitutes a significant global health issue, with the c.235delC mutation being the most prevalent pathogenic allele in East Asian populations. Existing interventions, such as hearing aids and cochlear implants, mitigate symptoms but fail to correct the underlying genetic defects, highlighting the need for precise therapeutic approaches. In this study, we developed a cellular disease model (293T-GJB2mut-EGFP) incorporating the c.235delC mutation and employed prime editing (PE) to restore the GJB2 functionality. We systematically optimized the pegRNA architecture and identified that the optimal pegRNA (PBS 9 bp, RTT 16 bp) achieved 37.15% correction with PE2. Incorporating Csy4 or evopreQ1motifs at the pegRNA 3' end resulted in comparable efficiencies (~37%). The introduction of two synonymous mutations (pegRNAMMD2) increased the efficiency to 48.94%. Among the seven prime editor variants, PEmax showed the highest intrinsic activity (49.14%). The PE3b nicking strategy with a + 1 nick sgRNA further improved the efficiency to 58.05%. To address adeno-associated virus (AAV) packaging limitations, a split-intein dual-AAV system for PEmax (bisected between residues 1153-1154) was developed. After nicking optimization, it showed comparable correction efficiency to a previously reported split site (residues 1024-1025), with no statistically significant difference. Off-target deep sequencing of the top four predicted loci revealed no significant editing above the background. These findings establish a comprehensively optimized prime editing toolkit for GJB2 c.235delC correction and provide a foundation for future AAV-mediated in vivo gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss.
Identifiers
42562992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.