Trial reportNature medicine2026
Psilocybin-assisted therapy for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder in a public healthcare setting: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The trials of translating psilocybin treatment from research to practice.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psilocybin-assisted therapy may be a promising new treatment for treatment-resistant depression. We examined the feasibility of administering a single 25-mg dose of psilocybin or placebo with psychological support in a randomized controlled trial design with 6 weeks of follow-up. A two-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled feasibility trial was conducted at one National Health Service (NHS) site in England. Eligible participants met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for major depressive disorder and had an inadequate response to ≥2 antidepressant treatments or ≥1 antidepressant plus ≥1 psychotherapy. Participants received 25-mg psilocybin or placebo with preparation, dosing support and integration. Primary outcomes were recruitment, retention and estimation of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) variance. A multilevel regression analysis with an intention-to-treat population was used. Sixty participants were randomized (1:1), balanced by age, sex and prior psilocybin exposure, and 59 of 60 participants completed the MADRS at all follow-up visits. The adjusted between-group difference at week 3 on the MADRS was -10.41 (95% confidence interval: -14.86 to -5.95; Cohen's d = -1.70), favoring psilocybin, which was sustained at week 6. In total, 123 and 164 nonserious adverse events occurred in the placebo and psilocybin arms, respectively. Findings support a future confirmatory trial. EudraCT no.: 2018-003573-97 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.