ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Retinal layers prognosticate cognitive progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptical coherence tomography (OCT) quantifies retinal neuroaxonal loss related to neurodegeneration in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and is associated with physical and cognitive disability. However, no data exist on the relationship between OCT metrics and cognitive progression independent of relapse activity (cognitive PIRA).
objectiveTo assess if OCT can prognosticate cognitive PIRA events in pwMS.
methodsProspective study with baseline OCT (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber- (pRNFL), macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform- (mGCIPL) and inner nuclear layers (mINL)) and brief international cognitive assessment for MS (BICAMS) at yearly visits. Cognitive PIRA in each test was defined as more than 10% decrease compared to previous visit (reference) and confirmed 12 months later (confirmation visit), without relapses 90 days before or 30 days after the event and confirmation visits. We employed Cox regression models adjusting for age, baseline cognitive test, education, and treatment.
results98 pwMS followed for a median of 5 years (63% female, 81% relapsing-remitting, age: 50.5 ± 11.6 years, median EDSS: 3.0). Each 1 µm increase in pRNFL thickness was associated with a 6% lower risk of Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) PIRA events (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94, p = 0.027). Each 1 µm increase in mGCIPL thickness was associated with a 6% lower risk of Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT) PIRA (HR = 0.94, p = 0.040). Each 1 μm increase in mINL thickness was associated with 20% lower risk of VLMT-PIRA (HR = 0.80, p = 0.030) and 50% higher risk of SDMT-PIRA events (HR = 1.50, p = 0.049).
conclusionRetinal layers can be sensitive, patient-friendly prognostic markers of cognitive PIRA in pwMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.