Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2026
Delayed secondary repair of third- and fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomized controlled trial comparing overlapping versus end-to-end sphincter repair.
Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecondary anal sphincter repair is necessary in fewer than 3% of cases following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI). Although there is some growing evidence comparing early and delayed secondary repairs, the traditional and most common way to manage secondary OASI is still delayed repair. This study compared clinical and functional outcomes of overlapping versus end-to-end sphincter repair techniques in delayed secondary repair of OASI.
methodsIn this single-center randomized controlled trial, 40 women with third- or fourth-degree OASI and wound dehiscence after primary repair were randomized 1:1 to overlapping sphincteroplasty or end-to-end approximation. Assessments were performed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was the Wexner incontinence score at 12 months. Analysis was per-protocol with intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis.
resultsThirty-eight women were included in the per-protocol analysis (overlapping n = 18; end-to-end n = 20). Two patients in the overlapping group were lost to follow-up. Operative time was significantly longer in the overlapping group (121.3 ± 5.5 vs 102.8 ± 6.3 min; p < 0.001). The overlapping repair resulted in a significantly lower mean Wexner score (0.5 ± 0.2 vs 2.2 ± 0.8; p < 0.001) and higher rate of complete continence (Wexner ≤ 5: 100% vs 85%; p = 0.03). Time to wound healing was shorter (23.3 ± 4.8 vs 26.9 ± 5.5 days; p = 0.08) and overall complications were lower (11.1% vs 30.0%) in the overlapping group. Endoanal ultrasound Starck scores and manometry parameters showed consistent trends favoring overlapping repair, although these differences were not statistically significant.
conclusionIn delayed secondary OASI repair, overlapping sphincteroplasty provided superior continence outcomes and lower complication rates than end-to-end repair, when combined with meticulous muscle mobilization and a standardized postoperative regimen. These findings support overlapping repair as the preferred technique in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.