Trial reportScientific reports2026
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of natural bovine bone with hyaluronic acid on osseointegration of immediate implants: a randomized clinical study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07199725 (Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Natural Bovine Bone With Hyaluronic Acid on Osseointegration of Immediate Implant), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Natural Bovine Bone With Hyaluronic Acid on Osseointegration of Immediate Implant: A Randomized Clinical Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and has gained wide application in bone regeneration, particularly in maxillofacial and dental research. HA derivatives and HA-incorporated composite scaffolds demonstrate strong potential in enhancing osteogenesis and mineralization. The aim of this work was to evaluate clinical and radiographic effects of natural bovine bone with HA on immediate implants. Sixteen immediate implants were placed in medically free patients with non-restorable single-rooted maxillary anterior or premolar teeth; Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 1 (Control): Implants placed in 8 fresh extraction sockets. Group 2 (Study): Implants placed in 8 fresh extraction sockets followed by grafting with a natural bovine bone material with HA. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured at the time of implant surgery and 4 months postoperatively. Bone density and buccal bone width were measured immediately and 6 months postoperatively using Cone Beam CT. After 4 months, the study group showed higher ISQs values than the control group (72.25 ± 2.66 vs. 64.88 ± 1.36, p < 0.001). Bone density was significantly higher in the study group at 6 months (1163.38 ± 112.64 HU vs. 1034.13 ± 71.19 HU, p = 0.016). A significant reduction in buccal bone width was observed at 6-month follow-up in both groups. The reduction was more pronounced in the control group (15.99%; p < 0.001) than in the study group (3.88%; p = 0.014). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups at either the immediate postoperative assessment or the 6-month follow-up. The use of natural bovine bone with hyaluronic acid after immediate implant placement enhances early implant stability, increases peri-implant bone density, and contributes to preservation of buccal bone dimensions, thereby supporting improved osseointegration.Trial registration: Current controlled trials NCT07199725 "Retrospectively registered" (registration date 02/09/2025).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.