ArticleScientific reports2026
Coherence and fidelity aware routing in quantum networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In quantum networks, routing mechanisms designed to deliver successfully multiple simultaneous requests to the destination under limited channel capacity should simultaneously consider resource usage optimization, entanglement-generation performance, and the quality of the end-to-end delivered entangled states. The routing approaches developed for quantum networks in the literature mostly consider the change in fidelity during routing. However, it should be noted that quantum states with the same fidelity value may have different levels of coherence. In this study, for the first time, a novel routing and purification approach for quantum networks is presented, using the end-to-end (E2E) relative entropy of coherence (REC) together with E2E fidelity to determine the purification level and the feasibility of candidate paths. In our study, the coherence- and fidelity-aware routing algorithm (CAFARA) is proposed. In CAFARA, the BBPSSW purification levels are determined for each candidate path and ordered from the lowest to the highest. This information is stored in a lookup table. Then, the lowest BBPSSW purification level that simultaneously satisfies the requested fidelity, REC, latency, and capacity constraints is selected. The E2E fidelity, REC, and required number of raw Bell pairs mentioned here are all stored together in the previously mentioned lookup table. This lookup table was constructed using imperfect initial Werner states, one-sided amplitude damping, Werner-state twirling, BBPSSW purification, and density-matrix-based entanglement swapping, and all calculations were completed before the routing process. As the final step, CAFARA selects the best path with the highest entanglement generation rate (EGR) from the selected feasible paths. In our study, the FARA-PostREC and FARA-NoREC algorithms were developed for comparison with CAFARA. While the FARA-PostREC algorithm uses the REC constraint during the final validation stage of the request, FARA-NoREC does not use any REC constraint; it uses only fidelity as the quality parameter of the paths and as the parameter for determining the purification level. In our simulations under varying link distance, channel capacity, network size, and request load, CAFARA achieved a better average request success rate than FARA-PostREC by reducing late-stage request drops related to coherence because it also uses REC during the purification-level determination stage while maintaining the required E2E fidelity and REC values. Although FARA-NoREC often accepts more requests and assumes that they are successfully delivered, the average final fidelity (AFF) and average final coherence (AFC) values of the requests considered successful are lower than those of the other algorithms; the AFC does not even satisfy the REC threshold. Overall, CAFARA provides a balanced trade-off between the quality-guaranteed request success rate, latency, purification overhead, and resource consumption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.