ArticleScientific reports2026
Long-term psychobiological stress responses following soft political repression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sociopolitical environment can act as a potent stressor with significant consequences for health and well-being. Of increasing global relevance in this context is soft political repression, including denunciation and surveillance, which is employed to prevent oppositional behavior while minimizing international attention. Although common in authoritarian regimes, including the former German Democratic Republic (GDR; 1949-1990), little is known about its psychobiological health consequences. We examined 100 individuals raised in the GDR (49 exposed to repression, 51 matched controls) to investigate stress responses, a key pathway to long-term health. Participants completed questionnaires and, if health-related inclusion criteria were met and they felt able to complete the task, underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST; repression n = 29, controls n = 46). Subjective stress, cortisol, heart rate, and heart rate variability were assessed. The repression group reported higher stress, but did not differ from controls in physiological measures. Subgroup analyses showed that repression participants who declined attending the TSST exhibited elevated symptoms of distress, anxiety, depression and trauma, whereas completers were comparable to controls. Our findings suggest differential long-term consequences of soft political repression, with preliminary evidence for both vulnerable and resilient groups and raise broader methodological questions regarding the ecological validity of laboratory-based stress research in vulnerable groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.