ArticleMacromolecular rapid communications2026
Properties of Liquid Crystalline Elastomer Foams.
Article in Macromolecular rapid communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate how controlled foaming alters the mechanical dissipation of liquid crystalline elastomers (LCEs). Using thermally expandable microspheres, we generate homogeneous foams with precisely tuned bubble volume fractions up to ∼13%, and compare their behavior with non‑mesogenic silicone analogues. We show that microsphere expansion induces a particle‑centered mesogenic interphase, arising from local elastic distortion and preferential alignment of mesogenic units at the inclusion surface. At low bubble volume fractions (≈0.5%-5%), isolated interphases produce a pronounced enhancement of intrinsic viscoelastic loss. Under impact loading, the optimum shifts to moderate bubble fractions because transient compression also engages bubble deformation, pad compliance, and structural integrity. At higher loadings, interphase overlap and mechanical constraint suppress this effect, and the dissipation returns toward baseline elastomeric values. Large‑strain tensile tests and impact experiments exhibit the same non‑monotonic trend, demonstrating that low‑density LCE foams achieve the highest mechanical energy absorption per unit mass. Compared with conventional high‑porosity polymer foams used for acoustic damping, these materials retain sufficient mechanical integrity to sustain impact loads, establishing a microstructural route to engineer high‑performance damping in soft solids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.