ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Layer 5 and 6b Extratelencephalic Neurons Encode Distinct Sound Features in Auditory Cortex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extratelencephalic (ET) neurons in layers (L)5 and 6b of the auditory cortex (ACtx) provide major corticofugal outputs to subcortical structures and contribute to auditory learning and experience-dependent plasticity. Although both ET subtypes innervate overlapping downstream targets, they differ in morphology, intrinsic physiology, and molecular identity, suggesting distinct functional roles. However, their in vivo response properties remain incompletely characterized. Here, we used a projection-defined viral strategy to express GCaMP8s selectively in L5 and L6b ET neurons in the ACtx of male and female mice and recorded calcium activity during presentation of diverse acoustic stimuli. L5 ET neurons predominantly exhibited sound-evoked excitation, higher response sparseness, and greater trial-to-trial reliability than L6b ET neurons; these differences were most pronounced for pure tones and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (sAM) noise. In contrast, L6b ET neurons frequently exhibited sound-evoked suppression, particularly for more complex stimuli (including sAM noise and spectrotemporal ripples). Unsupervised clustering identified separable temporal response motifs and tuning profiles. L5 ET neurons favored single-peaked frequency tuning and monotonically increasing intensity tuning, whereas L6b ET neurons exhibited complex frequency tuning, monotonically decreasing intensity tuning, and stronger pairwise functional coupling (noise correlations). Together, these results support complementary corticofugal processing streams, with L5 ET neurons conveying more selective acoustic feature representations and L6b ET neurons conveying more integrative corticofugal signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.