Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42562583›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Enhancing waste management awareness in future nurses: a theory-based educational intervention and psychometric evaluation of a measurement tool.

Neslihan Soylemez, Hilal Yıldırım

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neslihan SoylemezOsmaniye Korkut Ata Universitesi, Osmaniye, Turkey.
Hilal YıldırımInonu Universitesi, Malatya, Turkey firat.hilal@inonu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-3799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was conducted to evaluate the effect of waste separation and recycling education on waste management awareness among nursing students at a university and to examine the psychometric properties of a measurement tool designed to assess this awareness.

methodThe research was conducted using a single-group pretest-post-test quasi-experimental and methodological design. The population of the study consisted of individuals receiving nursing education; 180 participants were included in the pretest and 117 in the post-test. Data were collected using a Demographic Information Form and the Waste Management Awareness Scale. Following the pretest, a three-session, theory-based educational intervention focused on waste separation and recycling, each lasting approximately 40 min, was implemented and the post-test was administered after the third session.

findingsThe average age of participants was 20.37±1.52 and the majority were female (79.4%). The two-subscale structure of the scale was psychometrically supported and explained 58.20% of the total variance. A significant increase was found in waste management awareness scores after the training (p<0.001). The training intervention was found to have a moderate effect on waste management awareness and waste separation behaviours and a small-to-moderate effect on attitudes towards recycling (Cohen's d=0.30-0.44).

conclusionThe findings show that nursing students have a moderate level of waste management awareness and that theory-based structured education significantly strengthens this awareness. It is recommended that waste management awareness, as a measurable and developable construct, be addressed systematically and sustainably within nursing education.

Indexed as

RecyclingStudents, NursingWaste ManagementAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAwarenessHealth EducationNursesPsychometricsPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42562583
PMCPMC13448624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.