ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2026
Basic Technology to Support Stimulation Access, Activity, and Correct Posture in Individuals With Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: Development and Usability Study.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople with severe to profound intellectual disability and visual or visual and motor impairments often experience passivity and isolation. This can lead to limited environmental stimulation, reduced physical activity, and the acquisition of incorrect body postures. Approaches to improve the situation have generally involved increasing environmental stimulation, which was regulated by the context or controlled by the people through adaptive responding and assistive technology.
objectiveThis study assessed 2 intervention programs serving as extensions and advancements of previous approaches aimed at helping participants with intellectual and multiple disabilities control environmental stimulation through their own responses and assistive technology. The first program was designed to help 4 participants with severe intellectual disability and blindness alternate between periods of preferred music stimulation and mild physical activity. The second program was designed to help 5 participants with severe to profound intellectual disability, visual and motor impairments, and postural problems (ie, a tendency to tilt their torso and head forward). These participants were led to access preferred environmental stimulation, engage in mild physical activity, and increase correct posture.
methodsEach of the 2 programs was implemented according to a single-case research design. The technology for the first program involved (1) a smartphone with the MacroDroid app, which regulated the intervention conditions; (2) pressure sensors that allowed the participants to activate music stimulation; (3) a proximity sensor that monitored the participants' physical activity responses (ie, placing objects in a container high up in front of them); and (4) a mini speaker. The same technology was also used for the second program. In this program, the participants' physical activity responses consisted of arm-stretching movements, and the smartphone also served for monitoring the participants' correct posture. Within each program, a session included 7 music periods and 6 activity periods.
resultsDuring programs 1 and 2, the mean percentage of music pieces activated independently of research assistants' guidance was between 94.7% and 99.4%. The mean percentage of objects placed in the carton and of shelf-touching responses performed independently was between 98.7% and 99.7%. The baseline mean percentages were between 0% and 24.5%. The mean percentage of session time in a correct posture (program 2) increased to 71.1%-89.6% from baseline values of 18.8%-36.5%. A total of 8 of the 9 participants involved in the 2 programs showed higher levels of indices of happiness during program sessions than control sessions.
conclusionsThe results suggest that the programs might be a useful resource for supporting people with severe to profound intellectual disability and visual or visual and motor impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.