ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Real-World Implementation and Evaluation of a Digitally Enabled Care Pathway to Improve Depression Management in Primary Care: Controlled Pre-Post Analysis of the Pathway Platform.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04891224 (Implementation and Evaluation of the Pathway Platform), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation and Evaluation of the Pathway Platform: A Digitally Enabled Care Pathway to Improve Depression Key Performance Indicators and Patient Outcomes in Primary Care Clinics
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasurement-based care (MBC) and shared decision-making can improve clinical outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care. However, primary care providers often have limited time to administer patient-reported outcome measures recommended for MBC. Digital health tools like the Pathway Platform can help facilitate MBC and patient-provider engagement, aiding enhanced shared decision-making.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether implementation of the Pathway Platform improves adherence to MBC practices in primary care clinics compared with standard care. Secondary objectives included whether implementation of Pathway Platform improves additional clinical process measures and MDD remission and response.
methodsThis real-world, longitudinal implementation study screened participants aged ≥18 years with MDD who started an antidepressant or switched within 3 months in primary care clinics in Illinois. Data were collected 6 months retrospectively (from the preimplementation period) using electronic health records and manual chart reviews (control cohort), and 6 months prospectively (postimplementation, conducted 2021 to 2023) using electronic health records, manual chart reviews, and the Pathway Platform mobile app (Pathway cohort). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with ≥2 completed 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included health care resource usage, patient-provider engagement (13-Item Patient Activation Measure [PAM-13]), and overall functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale [WSAS]). Exploratory outcomes included cognitive functioning (5-Item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression [PDQ-D-5]) and MDD symptom improvement.
resultsThe control cohort had 90 participants (58% female), and the Pathway cohort had 89 (80% female). A significantly higher proportion of Pathway cohort participants completed ≥2 PHQ-9s than control cohort participants (19%, n=17 vs 12%, n=11; P=.01). All Pathway cohort participants completed ≥1 PHQ-9 assessment, and 45% (n=40) of participants opened the app at least once per week. Pathway participants were significantly less likely than controls to have behavioral health referrals (9%, n=8 vs 23%, n=21; P=.01). Patient-provider engagement assessed using PAM-13 showed significant improvement from baseline to 6 months among Pathway participants (n=54; median change from baseline 4, Q1 0 to Q3 9.2], 95% CI 0-4.9; P<.001). Median change from baseline to last available scores for WSAS (-4.0, Q1 -9 to Q3 1; P<.001) and PDQ-D-5 (-2, Q1 -6 to Q3 0; P<.001) showed improvement among patients in the Pathway cohort. Median PHQ-9 total score at 6 months was significantly lower in the Pathway cohort than the control cohort (6.5, Q1 3.0 to Q3 12.5 vs median 17.0, Q1 14.5 to Q3 20.0; P=.02), indicating improvement in MDD symptoms.
conclusionsThe Pathway Platform significantly improved PHQ-9 completion rates, patient-provider engagement (improved PAM-13 scores), and clinical outcomes for MDD, with fewer behavioral health referrals. These findings suggest that use of the Pathway Platform supports improved MBC, offering a promising tool to improve MDD outcomes in primary care settings.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04891224; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04891224. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43788.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.