Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42562019›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2026

Detection of zoonotic bacteria in wild Australian freshwater turtles.

T F Scheelings, Tth Van, R J Moore, L F Skerratt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T F ScheelingsMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0571-1309
Tth VanSchool of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-568X
R J MooreSchool of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0776-5861
L F SkerrattMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia.

Funding

McKenzie Postdoctoral Fellowship from the University of Melbourne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater turtles are long-lived, abundant components of Australian aquatic ecosystems, yet little is known about the diversity and prevalence of zoonotic bacteria they may carry. In this study, we conducted one of the most comprehensive surveys to date of zoonotic microorganisms associated with wild Australian freshwater turtles. A total of 257 individuals representing 10 species across 6 genera were sampled from multiple riverine and wetland systems. Using next generation sequencing, we detected 18 confirmed zoonotic bacterial species spanning 10 genera, including Acinetobacter, Vibrio, Plesiomonas, Campylobacter, and Clostridium. Nearly half of all turtles (49.8%) were shedding at least one zoonotic taxon at the time of capture, with some individuals carrying multiple species simultaneously. Several additional isolates from genera with known zoonotic potential could not be resolved to species level, highlighting gaps in current reference databases and the need for improved genomic characterisation. No Salmonella spp. were detected, consistent with previous research suggesting a low risk of reptile-associated salmonellosis from Australian freshwater turtles. Shedding prevalence varied markedly among turtle species and locations, suggesting that host ecology and environmental conditions influence bacterial acquisition and persistence. Due to data sparsity for many taxa, analyses were limited to descriptive assessments. Overall, these findings demonstrate that Australian freshwater turtles harbour a diverse assemblage of bacteria with zoonotic relevance and may act as reservoirs within aquatic environments. Continued surveillance, integration of genomic tools, and consideration of human-wildlife interaction contexts, including cultural harvesting, will be important for assessing public health implications and informing conservation and biosecurity strategies.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ZoonosesTurtlesZoonosesAnimalsAnimals, WildAustraliaFresh WaterPrevalencefreshwater turtlesmicrobiotapathogenspublic healthwildlife healthzoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42562019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.