Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561404›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Patients With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic or Supportive Therapy: Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey.

Roberto Collado-Borrell, Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, Antonio Prieto-Romero, Andres Jesus Muñoz Martin, Marta Cantero-Martín, Cristina Villanueva-Bueno, Jose Luis Revuelta-Herrero, Ana Herranz-Alonso, Maria Sanjurjo-Saez

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roberto Collado-Borrell *Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-0082
Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana *Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-8321
Antonio Prieto-RomeroHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-1363
Andres Jesus Muñoz MartinHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6977-8249
Marta Cantero-MartínHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.
Cristina Villanueva-BuenoHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-1629
Jose Luis Revuelta-HerreroHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-8928
Ana Herranz-AlonsoHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5517-0248
Maria Sanjurjo-SaezHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo, 46, Madrid, 28007, Spain, 34 915867714.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8523-3721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Background: The expansion of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has transformed the way patients access health information and manage their disease. In oncology and hematology care, the use of digital tools and mobile health has increased, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, although challenges remain regarding adoption, trust, and perceived utility. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the current use of ICTs by patients with cancer receiving antineoplastic and/or supportive therapy, to assess their interest in mobile apps for disease management, and to compare these findings with those obtained in a previous survey conducted in 2017. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional survey was conducted in a 1300-bed university hospital between August and December 2023. Adult patients with solid tumors or hematological malignancies receiving antineoplastic and/or supportive therapy were invited to complete a structured paper questionnaire based on a previous survey conducted in 2017. The questionnaire included 30 items regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, ICT use, preferences concerning health apps, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed to compare results between the prepandemic survey conducted in 2017 (2017 study group; n=612) and the postpandemic survey conducted in 2023 (2023 study group; n=690). Missing responses were reported as "no response" and were not imputed. Results: Smartphone use increased from 82.5% (505/612) to 91% (628/690; P<.001), and the proportion of patients with installed health apps rose from 20.3% (124/612) to 53.9% (372/690; P<.001). Familiarity with technological terms and the use of connected devices also improved. However, full trust in online health information remained low (64/690, 9.3%), with most patients reporting trust contingent on source credibility. Preference for videoconferencing as a communication channel with health care professionals increased from 19% (116/612) to 32% (221/690; P<.001), while the use of email and mobile apps for this purpose declined. Willingness to use apps recommended by health care professionals remained high, although it decreased slightly from 81.4% (498/612) to 77.8% (537/690). Conclusions: The use of ICTs and digital health tools among patients with cancer has increased significantly in recent years, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, barriers persist in terms of source credibility, usability, digital skills, and alignment with patient preferences. Strategies such as clinician-curated information sources, co-designed apps, simple communication channels, and targeted digital literacy support may help integrate these technologies more effectively and equitably in cancer care.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsAdultAgedCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineAntineoplastic Agentsdigital healthdigital literacyhealth communicationmobile appsmobile healthoncologypatients with cancersurveytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42561404
PMCPMC13447052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.