SynthesisArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2026
Artificial Intelligence Applied to Electrocardiogram-Based Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, underscoring the need for effective risk prediction and early detection. Although the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely available and low-cost diagnostic tool, its traditional interpretation is limited by subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising approach, capable of extracting hidden prognostic information from ECG signals. This systematic review aimed to assess original studies applying AI techniques to ECGs for cardiovascular risk prediction and mortality. Original studies that used ECG signals as the sole input variable for AI models, focusing on cardiovascular risk outcomes, were included. A systematic search was conducted in different databases, and data were synthesized narratively. Eleven studies were included, predominantly retrospective cohorts applying convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to predict cardiovascular risk or mortality. The sample primarily consisted of adult populations in high-income countries. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Reported AUROC values ranged from 0.63 to 0.961 in training sets, with some models outperforming traditional risk scores. AI-ECG models demonstrated the potential to detect subclinical disease, enabling early risk stratification even in normal ECGs. However, challenges remain regarding population diversity, model interpretability, and prospective validation. The application of AI to ECG analysis represents a promising advancement in personalized cardiovascular risk assessment. Nonetheless, further research is needed to ensure the safety, effectiveness, and equitable clinical integration of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.