ArticleCoDAS2026
What has been researched about implicit memory in speech-language-hearing pathology? A scoping review.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeto map how implicit memory has been addressed in international scientific speech-language-hearing production. RESEARCH STRATEGIES: An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases, supplemented by a manual search of references of the included studies. The scoping review was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis Manual, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/PNDWF). SELECTION: criteria: Studies addressing implicit memory in speech-language-hearing contexts, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish, regardless of year of publication, were included. DATA: analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data, considering design, population, objectives, and main outcomes. The studies were grouped by area of application and synthesized by descriptive and narrative analysis.
resultsA total of 2,565 documents were identified, of which 39 comprised this review. The studies were grouped into three categories (language, audiology, and voice). The most frequent themes found were the application of implicit learning in speech-language-hearing contexts; the use of implicit tasks for the assessment and characterization of disorders; and investigations of biases, prejudices, and/or implicit perceptions in speech-language-hearing practice.
conclusionThe literature deals with implicit memory in a limited and heterogeneous manner, mainly in language, audiology, and voice, focusing on implicit learning, assessment, and biases. Despite its clinical potential, there is a lack of conceptual and methodological systematization, indicating the need for future research to consolidate its use in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.