ArticleCoDAS2026
Cross-cultural validation of the self-assessment of competence in communication - SACCom - to Italian.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo carry out the cross-cultural validation of the Self-Assessment of Competence in Communication - SACCom to Italian.
methodsThe cross-cultural validation procedure followed the recommendations and guidelines of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and consisted of five stages: 1) Translation of the SACCom from Brazilian Portuguese (BP) into Italian by three bilingual speech-language-hearing pathologists; 2) Preparation of a consensus version; 3) Back-translation from Italian into BP by a fourth bilingual speech-language-hearing pathologist; 4) Comparison of the back-translation with the original instrument and preparation of the final version in Italian called Test di Autovalutazione della Competenza nella Comunicazione (TACCom-IT); and, 5) Application of the TACCom-IT pre-test to 101 native Italians whose voice and communication are essential to their profession. At this stage, the option "not applicable" was added to the answer key.
resultsIn the translation, there were different lexical choices regarding the title, instructions, and seven items. In the back-translation, there were conceptual disagreements in the title and instructions, and lexical disagreements in five items. The expert committee made changes to the title, instructions, and three items. In the pre-test phase, a significantly higher proportion of participants responded with options from the instrument's usual answer key for all items.
conclusionThe Italian adapted version of SACCom, entitled Test di Autovalutazione della Competenza nella Comunicazione (TACCom-IT), shows satisfactory cultural and linguistic equivalence in relation to the original instrument and is considered cross-culturally valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.