ArticleCoDAS2026
MMBGR protocol - diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination in preschoolers.
Article in CoDAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present the diagnostic accuracy of the scored Clinical Examination of the MMBGR Orofacial Myofunctional Assessment Protocol for the age range of 24 to 71 months.
methodsDiagnostic accuracy validation study with a convenience sample. Fourteen speech-language pathologists analyzed images of 132 participants from the database of previous validation stages, divided into two groups (G1 = 24 to 35 months and 29 days; G2 = 36 to 71 months and 29 days). Each image was analyzed individually and independently by a panel of three expert speech-language pathologists, with agreement between at least two evaluators considered valid. Opinions regarding domains of the orofacial myofunctional examination, Orofacial Myofunctional Disorder (OMD), and referral needs were recorded using an electronic form. The speech-language pathologists' responses based on clinical experience, without using the protocol (gold standard), were compared with those obtained using the Protocol (index test). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied, cutoff points were established, and sensitivity and specificity values were obtained using R Core Team software (2022).
resultsDiagnostic accuracy in preschool children in G1 was ideal and in G2 was reasonable for orofacial structures. For orofacial functions, accuracy was ideal in G1 and reasonable in G2; for tone, accuracy was reasonable in both groups. For OMD, accuracy was reasonable for both G1 and G2. The cutoff point for OMD was 15 (24-35 months) and 22 (36-71 months). Accuracy was reasonable for predicting multidisciplinary and speech-language pathology referrals.
conclusionThe MMBGR Protocol demonstrated adequate diagnostic accuracy for orofacial structures and functions in preschool children. It showed reasonable accuracy for diagnosing OMD and for predicting multidisciplinary and speech-language pathology referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.