ArticleBrazilian oral research2026
Accuracy of remote diagnosis of oral mucositis in children and adolescents with cancer using a mobile App: a pilot study.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote examinations have become increasingly common in Dentistry, especially with the use of applications. This preliminary cross-sectional study evaluated the accuracy of remote examination of oral mucositis (OM) and severe oral mucositis (SOM) using photos obtained through the Telepediatric Dentistry in Oncology (TON) application, comparing its results with the in-person clinical examination (gold standard). A total of 21 pediatric patients (13 boys, 8 girls; mean age 9.05 ± 3.46 years) undergoing chemotherapy were examined, totaling 28 in-person examinations and 224 photographic images assessed remotely by four calibrated dentists (Kappa > 0.7). The photos covered eight oral cavity sites (lips, right and left buccal mucosa, tongue dorsum, lateral tongue, palate, and floor of the mouth) and were analyzed for the presence or absence of OM and SOM. Among the 28 examinations, 11 presented OM and 3 presented SOM. The remote examination identified all positive cases (sensitivity 100%; 95%CI: 0.741-1), while specificity was 59% for OM, reflecting the occurrence of false positives, especially in the lips and buccal mucosa. Agreement between remote examiners and the gold standard ranged from 0.17 to 1.0, depending on the region and evaluator, being higher in the tongue dorsum, lateral tongue, and floor of the mouth. The results indicate that remote examination via TON may be feasible and has the ability to detect OM and SOM, potentially serving as a complementary tool in dental monitoring of children and adolescents undergoing oncology treatment, particularly when in-person examination is not possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.