Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561276›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026

Instruments for measuring emotional assessment in hospital nursing care: a scoping review.

Frederico Marques Andrade, Lanuza Borges Oliveira, Patrícia Pereira Alves, Maria Eduarda Borges Rodrigues, Carla Silvana de Oliveira E Silva

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederico Marques AndradeUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros. Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-8703
Lanuza Borges OliveiraUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros. Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0001-654X
Patrícia Pereira AlvesUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros. Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6887-1765
Maria Eduarda Borges RodriguesAfya Centro Universitário Montes Claros. Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4099-2158
Carla Silvana de Oliveira E SilvaUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros. Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-9990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto analyze the instruments used by nursing professionals in hospital care to measure emotional states.

methodsthis scoping review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, with a protocol registered in Open Science Framework. The search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Virtual Health Library. Data were organized in EndNote and analyzed using ATLAS.ti web, following Bardin's content analysis technique.

resultsof the 1,335 studies identified, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five instruments for assessing emotional states applied to hospital nurses were mapped, most of which were not specific to nursing. Five thematic axes were identified: well-being; stress/burnout; job satisfaction; coping strategies; and interpersonal relationships.

conclusionsa wide variety of instruments were observed, with a predominance of scales developed in other contexts and a scarcity of tools validated specifically for nursing.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychometricsHumansJob Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42561276
PMCPMC13432809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.