ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
An education intervention delivered to nursing faculty: an acceptability and feasibility study.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto determine the acceptability and feasibility of a health-related program planning educational intervention delivered to nursing faculty in Brazil, comparing preand post-learning knowledge.
methodsa feasibility study conducted at two Brazilian universities. Sixteen professors were recruited and underwent a multi-component intervention that addressed the content in two phases: ten pre-recorded sessions and readings; five live interactive online sessions. Knowledge and acceptability data were analyzed descriptively, and t-test analyzes were also calculated to determine the difference in knowledge and ability scores.
resultsthe findings indicate that participants considered the educational intervention both acceptable and feasible. However, they also expressed concerns regarding insufficient time to fully engage with the intervention due to work-related responsibilities, emphasizing the need for an extra question-and-answer session to enhance support for content practical application.
conclusionsour findings suggest the intervention is acceptable and feasible, and will support expanding assessment tests through a large-scale clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.