ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Proposal of a method for clinical validation of ICNP® terminological subsets in hospital practice.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto describe a methodological proposal for the clinical validation of terminological subsets of the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®), applicable to hospital settings.
methodsthis is a descriptive study that proposes methodological strategies for clinical validation of subsets, incorporating practical application in real care scenarios, evaluation by clinical judges, and statistical tests of agreement.
resultsthe method consists of five stages: (1) Application of the Nursing Process, focusing on the systematic collection of clinical data; (2) Construction of clinical case studies; (3) Clinical validation of ICNP® statements, conducted by nurse clinical judges; (4) Assessment of agreement among judges using robust statistical analyses; and (5) Synthesis of findings and refinement of the terminological subset.
conclusionsthe method can be replicated in different clinical contexts, strengthening the scientific basis and visibility of nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.