Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561249›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026

Communication strategies used in pediatric urology by specialist professionals.

Cristiane Feitosa Salviano, Gisele Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristiane Feitosa SalvianoHospital da Criança de Brasília José Alencar. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-6011
Gisele MartinsUniversidade de Brasília. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-6195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto describe the communication strategies used by urology specialists to obtain information directly from children.

methodsa qualitative study with professionals who had been treating children with urinary and intestinal symptoms for at least one year. Semi-structured interviews were carried out, and thematic analysis was conducted and mediated by NVIVO version 12.0.

resultsfourteen specialist professionals were interviewed. From their statements, three thematic categories emerged: (1) Verbal communication, with adaptation of language, use of simple terms and analogies; (2) Nonverbal communication, with visual resources such as drawings, scales and voiding diaries; (3) Play and playful strategies, such as the use of dolls to demonstrate positioning on the toilet, dramatizations and games to facilitate verbal expression of symptoms. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: language adaptation, photo-elicitation, and playful tools prove to be effective communication strategies within pediatric urology. These strategies are low-cost, and can be developed and adapted to clinical practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationPediatricsUrologyChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42561249
PMCPMC13435855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.