Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561195›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026

Mapping 35 years of medical specialty theses on clinical nutrition in Türkiye: the rise of the muscle-focused paradigm.

Zeynep Irmak Kaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zeynep Irmak KayaEskişehir City Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine and Nutrition - Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3954-1985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the thematic and methodological evolution, alignment with global literature, and publication conversion rates of medical specialty theses in clinical nutrition in Turkey between 1990 and 2025.

methodsA total of 750 theses were retrospectively analyzed from the Turkish National Thesis Center database. Data were evaluated for thematic content, diagnostic tools, and interdisciplinary distribution using Callon's centrality/density metrics and segmented regression models.

resultsThe dominant research themes were sarcopenia and muscle health (36.5%), nutritional support (28.0%), and malnutrition scores (26.4%). A strong thematic association was found between sarcopenia and frailty, primarily concentrated in geriatrics. Geriatrics exhibited the highest statistical density for sarcopenia and frailty themes (Adjusted Residual: +6.1). Objective muscle measurements were included in 48.2% of theses, with 65% of these utilizing computed tomography-based "opportunistic imaging." Segmented regression identified 2015 as a significant structural breakpoint in thesis production (p<0.001). The overall publication rate was 28.4%, with the highest conversion observed in sarcopenia-focused theses (42.0%; 95%CI 36.2-47.8). Conversely, cachexia was the least represented area (1.2%).

conclusionClinical nutrition research in Türkiye has evolved into a muscle-focused, phenotype-based paradigm, with geriatrics serving as the primary driver. While sarcopenia has become central to clinical research, complex wasting syndromes like cachexia remain academically neglected. These findings demonstrate that geriatric nutrition plays a decisive role in national academic output, though more holistic and multidisciplinary research strategies are needed for future academic training.

Indexed as

GeriatricsNutritional SciencesBibliometricsHumansMalnutritionNutritional SupportRetrospective StudiesSarcopeniaTurkey

Identifiers

PMID42561195
PMCPMC13427250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.