Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561188›Full record

Observational studyUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026

Head-to-head prospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in patients undergoing surgery for deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification.

B Pete, K Turtóczki, A Bokor, I Kalina, I Madár, L Lipták, J Rigó, N Ács, G Szabó

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B PeteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4369-0375
K TurtóczkiDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
A BokorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-2438
I KalinaDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
I MadárDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3528-6461
L LiptákDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
J RigóDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-6516
N ÁcsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-1869
G SzabóDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-8260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo perform a head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) vs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative detection of endometriosis using the #Enzian classification system.

methodsThis was a prospective observational study of postmenarchal premenopausal women who underwent laparoscopy between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2024 in a tertiary referral center for clinical suspicion of endometriosis. All women underwent both transvaginal and transabdominal US imaging, according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) protocol, as well as MRI evaluation. The sonologist and the radiologist were blinded to each other's results. The diagnostic performance of US and MRI were determined for the following #Enzian compartments: O (ovarian endometriosis), T (adhesions at the level of the tubo-ovarian unit), A (deep endometriosis (DE) in the vagina, rectovaginal septum and torus uterinus), B (DE in the uterosacral ligament, cardinal ligament, parametrium and pelvic sidewall), C (DE in the rectosigmoid bowel), FI (lesions in other intestinal locations), FB (urinary bladder involvement), FU (ureteric involvement) and FO (lesions in other extragenital locations). The sensitivity and specificity were compared between imaging modalities using McNemar's test. Concordance between preoperative imaging and surgical assessment of #Enzian severity grade for endometriotic lesions/adhesions in #Enzian compartments O, T, A, B and C was assessed.

resultsIn total, 463 women who underwent laposcopy for diagnosis and excisional treatment of endometriosis were enrolled in the study. For the detection of endometriotic lesions/adhesions in #Enzian compartments O

conclusionsUS evaluation following the IDEA protocol has significantly higher specificity compared with that of MRI for pelvic adhesions in #Enzian compartment T. However, US and MRI have similarly high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DE in all relevant #Enzian compartments. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPreoperative CareProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographydiagnostic accuracyendometriosishead‐to‐head comparisonmagnetic resonance imagingtransvaginal sonographyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42561188
PMCPMC13532160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.