Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561028›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Mental health, social determinants and One Health in skin neglected tropical diseases (NTDs): A scoping review.

India Hotopf, Idiatou Diallo, Jennifer Ljungqvist, Josefine Tecklenborg, Sascha Knauf, Anna S Fahrion, Alexandra Juhász, Rosalind McCollum, Gillian Turner, Julian Eaton

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

India HotopfDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3340-9266
Idiatou DialloDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jennifer LjungqvistDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Josefine TecklenborgInstitute of International Animal Health/One Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
Sascha KnaufInstitute of International Animal Health/One Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
Anna S FahrionInstitute of International Animal Health/One Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald - Insel Riems, Germany.
Alexandra JuhászDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Rosalind McCollumDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gillian TurnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Julian EatonDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin NTDs cause mental ill health, primarily through social stigma and discrimination, overburdening services and undermining elimination efforts. A holistic One Health (OH) approach is essential for NTD elimination, but evidence and operational guidance lack. This scoping review documents the current state of integration of mental health and OH-based skin-NTD programmes. It forms part of a series of reviews on the role of OH in skin NTDs, led by the WHO skin NTD working groups. METHODOLOGY: We searched four peer-reviewed databases for terms related to skin NTDs, OH, mental health and social determinants of health (SDH). Peer-reviewed articles exploring all four concepts were eligible, with no language/geographical/time constraints. Grey literature, conference abstracts and non-peer-reviewed materials were excluded. Abstract screening and extraction was supported by ASreview and NotebookLM. Outcomes related to mental health, OH/SDH and skin NTDs were analysed and charted, using a descriptive thematic analysis approach. PRINCIPAL

findingsTwenty-two papers were included; predominantly quantitative studies in Africa, focused on cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), with few intervention studies. Mental health was typically explored as a downstream effect (primarily stigma and distress), with limited use of validated instruments. Few studies meaningfully embedded OH approaches, including cross-sectoral collaboration and changes were rarely attributed to climate change. A theoretical framework for the multi-directional and intersectional relationship between mental health, SDH and OH is presented. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The underlying mechanisms of mental health remain poorly characterised, with a lack of integrated OH thinking. Exposure to skin NTDs is generally due to lack of agency and choice. Evidence on the role of household economic conditions and climate change in relation to mental health and skin NTDs lacks. Participatory research has a critical role to play in co-designing nuanced OH-informed interventions, but it is critical that we build on identified synergies within existing frameworks, including person-centred care and syndemics.

Indexed as

Mental HealthNeglected DiseasesSocial Determinants of HealthHolistic HealthHumansSkin DiseasesSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID42561028
PMCPMC13485127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.