ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Implicit biases change more slowly in larger cities.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Implicit biases remain a contributor to discrimination despite widespread endorsement of equality. Although there has been a large-scale reduction in sexuality, race, and skin tone biases in the past two decades, there is a current shortage of quantitative theories that describe how and why biases change. Here, I present a theory of implicit bias change, which focuses on changes in exposure due to cultural information and how the speed of these changes varies geographically. This model makes counterintuitive predictions when compared with previous findings, including 1) that biases change more slowly in larger cities and 2) that one-off interventions are less effective in larger cities. I confirm these predictions using 14 million tests of implicit biases from U.S. residents over 14 y and experimental data from 1,150 individuals. Documenting the typical timescales and patterns that govern implicit bias change is an important step toward designing interventions that can facilitate further reductions in biases and prevent biases from increasing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.