ArticlePloS one2026
Modeling wind erosion susceptibility of Eastern Iran using machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Modeling wind erosion susceptibility of Eastern Iran using machine learning.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wind erosion and dust storms pose significant environmental and socio-economic threats to Iran's drylands, driven by both natural processes and human activities. This study addresses a critical gap by employing advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to generate high-resolution spatial susceptibility maps for wind erosion in the highly vulnerable eastern and northeastern regions of Iran. We evaluated ten distinct ML models using a comprehensive set of environmental predictors including climatic, soil, topographic, and geological variables to identify areas most prone to erosion. Our results demonstrated that the Random Forest (RF) and Ensemble (ESMs) models outperformed others, achieving high predictive accuracy based on ROC, TSS, and Kappa metrics. These models revealed that approximately 27-30% of the study area is susceptible to moderate or high-intensity wind erosion. Key drivers influencing erosion distribution were identified as soil texture (particularly sand content), specific bio-climatic factors (temperature seasonality and precipitation patterns), and topographic features such as elevation and wetness index. The resulting susceptibility maps provide a vital decision-support tool for policymakers and land managers, enabling targeted mitigation strategies in priority zones. Without effective intervention, these areas face accelerated land degradation, threatening agricultural sustainability and potentially exacerbating socio-economic challenges such as rural-to-urban migration. This study underscores the value of machine learning in environmental hazard assessment and offers a scalable framework for wind erosion management in arid regions worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.