ArticlePloS one2026
Viviendo entre dos culturas: Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Psychological Acculturation Scale among Latinx caregivers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the structure, internal consistency, language-based measurement invariance, and construct validity of the Psychological Acculturation Scale (PAS), which assesses psychological acculturation via emotional attachment and belonging-based indicators. Analyses were conducted on a sample of 511 Latinx caregivers of youth with emotional/behavioral problems living in the United States (U.S.). Caregivers provided survey data either in English or Spanish on key sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, binary-gender, generational status in the U.S., language preference) and on psychological acculturation. Findings suggest that the PAS unidimensional factor structure had excellent internal consistency (α = .96, English α = .96, Spanish α = .90) and strong factor loadings (.75-.88) but fit indices for a confirmatory factor analysis were mixed. Post-hoc exploratory factor analyses were conducted to determine whether the model fit could be improved through the identification of a multidimensional structure, which uncovered two factors: (a) cultural identity and social belonging, and (b) cultural competence and familiarity. However, the two-factor solution fit better but had a high degree of overlap/redundancy (covariance = .923). A bifactor analysis suggest that the cultural identity and social belonging scale was unstable after accounting for the global scale and associated fit indices supported a unidimensional structure. The PAS unidimensional structure did not achieve configural invariance across English/Spanish versions, which suggest that differences in scores between language forms should be interpreted with caution. Our findings support the cautious use of the PAS as a brief unidimensional proxy measure of psychological acculturation to facilitate research with English/Spanish speaking Latinx caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.