ArticlePloS one2026
Study on the performance of cement composites using composite-activated coal gangue.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the feasibility of utilizing thermally activated coal gangue as a partial replacement for Portland cement through a composite activation strategy involving red mud and sodium silicate. Orthogonal experimental design, together with isothermal calorimetry, low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), was employed to systematically evaluate the hydration behavior, microstructural evolution, and compressive strength development of the cementitious system. he results showed that sodium silicate significantly influenced hydration kinetics by delaying the main hydration stage and broadening the exothermic peak. LF-NMR analysis further indicated that systems containing sodium silicate maintained continuous water consumption during the later stages of hydration, suggesting a sustained hydration process. Red mud contributed to the regulation of hydration and partially compensated for the strength reduction associated with the incorporation of thermally activated coal gangue. Compared with sodium silicate activation alone, the combined incorporation of red mud and sodium silicate resulted in lower compressive strength at all curing ages. RD and SEM-EDS analyses indicated that the co-activated system exhibited a relatively heterogeneous distribution of hydration products and a less compact microstructure. These microstructural characteristics were consistent with its comparatively lower mechanical performance. Overall, this study provides insight into the interaction between red mud and sodium silicate in coal gangue-based cementitious materials and offers theoretical support for optimizing composite activation strategies and promoting the efficient utilization of industrial solid wastes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.