Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560889›Full record

ReviewToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2026

Review of in vitro approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems.

Ranjini Mukherjee, Chathuri Mudalige, Ayesha Hammad Khan, Maria Fernanda Gonzalez-Acosta, Min Seo Hong, Jean-Pierre Desforges

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ranjini MukherjeeDepartment of Environmental Studies and Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada.
Chathuri MudaligeDepartment of Environmental Studies and Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada.
Ayesha Hammad KhanDepartment of Environmental Studies and Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada.
Maria Fernanda Gonzalez-AcostaDepartment of Environmental Studies and Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada.
Min Seo HongDepartment of Environmental Studies and Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada.
Jean-Pierre DesforgesDepartment of Environmental Studies and Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 2E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-7697

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch Manitoba, and the Mitacs GlobalinkThe University of Winnipeg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread presence of chemicals in the environment poses significant health risks to humans and wildlife. Existing traditional in vivo approaches, while informative, are limited by considerable ethical, economic, and logistical challenges that prevent timely and effective chemical testing and management strategies. To overcome these challenges, new approach methodologies (NAMs) offer promising alternatives for high-throughput, mechanistic, and ethically conscious chemical toxicity testing. The key to testing chemicals for potential adverse effects is the selection of appropriate bioassays that cover the range of biological or physiological pathways likely targeted by the contaminant of interest. In other words, chemical testing strategies need to cover a broad range of physiological systems to account for the mechanistic specificity of contaminants. Researchers and regulators thus face the challenge of navigating this interdisciplinary and rapidly growing space. This in-depth review attempts to address this important challenge by identifying and describing existing in vitro bioassays that can be used to assess functional impacts of chemical contaminants across vital physiological systems: endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, neurological, and hepatic. By summarizing the current tools and methodologies, this article provides a comprehensive guide for researchers and regulators to help identify relevant NAMs for use in modern chemical toxicity testing strategies.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsToxicity TestsAnimalsBiological AssayHumansRisk AssessmentEnvironmental Pollutantsbioassaysbiomarkerschemical risk assessmentin vitro toxicity testingnew approach methodologies (NAMs)physiological systems

Identifiers

PMID42560889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.