ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
From carbon reduction to care quality: a stakeholder-informed agenda for decarbonizing care homes.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reducing carbon emissions in care homes is not just an environmental goal; it is also a care-quality issue. Care homes have received far less attention than hospitals, despite being long-term living environments where older adults depend on buildings and organizational systems for comfort, safety, and wellbeing. Residents are especially susceptible to poor indoor environmental conditions, heat, cold, and service disruption. Drawing on the emerging literature and informed by recent stakeholder consultation with the care home sector, this Forum paper argues that decarbonization in care homes should be reframed as a gerontological care-quality priority rather than treated solely as an environmental or technical issue. The evidence base remains narrow, focused mainly on energy and emissions rather than on how low-carbon changes affect residents, staff, and the viability of care. We propose a stakeholder-informed conceptual model spanning four interrelated domains: the built environment; material and supply systems; workforce capability and culture; and governance and measurement. Reframing care home decarbonization in these terms offers a more credible basis for implementation, policy development, and future gerontological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.