Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560851›Full record

ArticleMMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report2026

Poisoning Deaths in a Workshop for Ceremonial Papermaking - China, May 2025.

Zhi Jiang, Siwei Luo, Di Wu, Qi Yang, Fuqin Chen, Jing Chen, Wei Nie, Youming Li, Huihui Liu, Yingxin Pei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhi Jiang
Siwei Luo
Di Wu
Qi Yang
Fuqin Chen
Jing Chen
Wei Nie
Youming Li
Huihui Liu
Yingxin Pei

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On May 14, 2025, a county-level Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) in southwestern China received a report of the sudden death of four employees of a small workshop for ceremonial papermaking, which was operating without required safety and environmental approvals. The first person who died was a woman who lost consciousness while cleaning a wastewater tank. During the next 20 minutes, three of the woman's family members, also employees, entered the tank to attempt to rescue her. All four persons, including the workshop operator's wife, the workshop operator's son, the workshop operator, and the workshop operator's daughter, died. The county China CDC launched an immediate investigation, and the Intermediate Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program and provincial and city China CDC staff members conducted a joint, on-site investigation that included identification of cases, analysis of the gas composition, and interviews of residents of the town and physicians to identify the cause of the apparent toxic exposure. Analyses revealed that levels of the highly toxic gases hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, and phosphine were several times higher than the maximum allowable concentrations. Clinical signs among the decedents were consistent with poisoning by these gases. Lack of personal protective equipment in a confined space and the presence of toxic gases likely led to the multiple exposures and delayed response by rescue services. Although working in confined spaces with toxic gases is a known exposure risk, these exposures continue to be reported in China and have included deaths in the papermaking industry. These deaths highlight the importance of effective regulations for papermaking workshops and administrative controls, improved supervision, and education for workers.

Indexed as

Gas PoisoningOccupational ExposureChinaFatal OutcomeFemaleHumansMalePaper

Identifiers

PMID42560851
PMCPMC13446640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.