ArticleIUCrJ2026
Considerations for FAIR data catalogs from DAPHNE4NFDI.
Article in IUCrJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale photon and neutron (PaN) experiments generate vast amounts of valuable data, yet implementation of the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) remains incomplete. Metadata catalogs are a key tool for addressing this challenge. They do not store data itself but provide structured searchable descriptions that make datasets discoverable and reusable. This article, developed within the DAPHNE4NFDI consortium of Germany's National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI), reflects the discussion on the role of metadata catalogs in PaN science such as SciCat, ICAT and SampleDB from a scientific point of view, and presents the status of current implementations. Integration of standards such as NeXus, sample databases and electronic laboratory notebooks is also addressed. Catalog implementations are categorized by purpose as raw data, institutional data and public data, and examined by practical aspects including authentication and authorization, persistent identifiers, and metadata enrichment. Drawing on case studies such as the RefXAS X-ray absorption spectroscopy database, we summarize lessons learned and present recommendations for minimizing fragmentation, enabling interoperability, and harmonizing identity and persistent-identifier policies. Looking ahead, semantic technologies and knowledge graphs will play a central role in building a federated FAIR-compliant catalog infrastructure that supports both facility and university researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.