Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560686›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2026

Mathematical Biomarkers of Adaptive Therapy Outcomes in Prostate Cancer.

Kit Gallagher, Maximilian A Strobl, Robert A Gatenby, Jingsong Zhang, Philip K Maini, Alexander R Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kit GallagherWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Maximilian A StroblTheory Division, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Robert A GatenbyIntegrated Mathematical Oncology Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Jingsong ZhangDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Philip K MainiWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexander R AndersonIntegrated Mathematical Oncology Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adaptive therapy is an evolution-based treatment paradigm that has been shown to delay resistance in prostate cancer through treatment breaks that control, rather than minimize, tumor burden. However, patient responses are highly heterogeneous, and there is a significant unmet clinical need for biomarkers to personalize treatment scheduling. Objective: To develop and retrospectively validate mathematical biomarkers that predict time to progression (TTP), mean daily dose, and overall survival (OS) under adaptive therapy from first-cycle prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective modeling and validation study used longitudinal, nonrandomized clinical trial data from 2 independent cohorts: 40 patients with castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) (June 1996 to September 2006) and 13 patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (April 2015 to January 2022). A 2-population differential equation model was used to describe the overall tumor growth through the competing dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. The statistical analysis was conducted from January 2025 to May 2026. Exposures: Patients received either intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (for CSPC) or adaptive abiraterone acetate (for mCRPC). The initial treatment cycle served as the exposure period to extract longitudinal PSA kinetics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mechanism-based mathematical biomarkers (adaptive therapy score, expected TTP, and expected mean daily dose) were derived from first-cycle PSA kinetics. Outcomes included in silico benchmarking experiments and retrospective validation against clinical TTP and OS. Performance was benchmarked against standard phenomenological PSA metrics (eg, PSA nadir, time to nadir, and doubling time). Results: Overall, data from 53 patients across 2 clinical trials were included. In the CSPC cohort of 40 patients, the adaptive therapy score derived from first-cycle data was highly prognostic for prolonged clinical TTP (univariable hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.76; P = .002). In the mCRPC cohort of 13 patients, the adaptive therapy score exhibited a strong rank correlation with clinical TTP (Spearman ρ = 0.76; P = .002) and was associated with prolonged TTP (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.07; P = .07). Analysis of long-term survival data in the mCRPC cohort demonstrated that both the adaptive therapy score and expected TTP were significantly associated with prolonged OS, whereas standard empirical PSA metrics displayed no association with OS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this modeling and validation study, mechanism-based mathematical biomarkers derived from the initial-cycle PSA dynamics accurately predicted patient-specific outcomes and survival, outperforming traditional phenomenological PSA monitoring. These accessible metrics could act as a mathematically informed decision support framework to stratify patients into personalized treatment protocols.

Identifiers

PMID42560686
PMCPMC13448836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.