ArticleJAMA network open2026
Patient-Reported Experiences of Abortion Travel.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding the mechanisms of harm: Crisis pregnancy centers and reproductive health in the post-Dobbs era.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Illinois is an abortion hub serving a high volume of patients who travel from midwestern and southern states for abortion care. To sustain access to quality services and reduce health care barriers, research is needed to understand the experiences of abortion travelers. Objectives: To explore the experiences of out-of-state individuals who travel to central and southern Illinois to receive abortion care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used purposeful sampling to recruit 208 participants at 2 abortion clinics between November 2024 and August 2025. Participants completed the study at the time of recruitment. Exposure: Participants traveled for abortion care based on their state of residence. Main outcomes and measures: Using reflexive thematic analysis, both the experiences of out-of-state abortion travelers in central and southern Illinois and the need for reduction in access barriers for those traveling for abortion were examined. Results: In this qualitative study of 208 abortion seekers who successfully traveled to Illinois, 128 (61.54%) self-identified as Black, 50 (24.03%) non-Hispanic White, and 30 (14.42%) as women from additional minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Participants' age ranged from 18 to 45 years. All lived in midwestern or southern states. Participants were interviewed in a private room at the clinic between November 2024 and August 2025. Participants discussed structural, logistical, and emotional challenges. Yet, they described abortion traveling as necessary because of the abortion ban and misinformation, which contributed to increased medical distrust. Medical distrust was already rooted in some participants' previous experiences of receiving biased reproductive care, and for Black women, it worsened because of historical mistreatment and discrimination. Increased medical distrust likely drove people to travel for abortion care. Conclusions and relevance: These findings call for enhanced coordination of care with centralized trusted resources, equitable distribution of funding, mental health support, and attention to reduce biased care for Black women. The results also highlight the need to develop strategies to combat misinformation and increase advocacy efforts to reduce abortion stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.