ReviewAIDS and behavior2026
Exploring Adolescent Girls' and Young Women's Perceptions of HIV Prevention Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use: A Qualitative Synthesis of Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa.
Review in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent girls' and young women's (AGYW) perceptions of HIV prevention Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) shape interest in use, uptake and sexual decisions. Although PrEP and its choices are increasingly available in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), evidence on how AGYW perceive its use in their daily lives remains fragmented. This qualitative evidence synthesis reviewed existing studies on AGYW's perception of PrEP in SSA. Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CABI, and ProQuest were searched for studies published between January 2012 and December 2024 that reported AGYW's views on PrEP use in SSA. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis and managed in NVivo. The methodological quality was appraised using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist. Reporting adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ). A total of 3,104 studies were identified; 24 studies from seven countries in SSA met the inclusion criteria. Three themes were developed regarding AGYW's perceptions of PrEP use: the protective role of PrEP, confidence, and its effectiveness; empowerment, agency, and hope for future health and sexuality; and behaviour change concerns while on PrEP. This systematic review highlights the complex and paradoxical perceptions of PrEP among AGYW, emphasising the need for comprehensive sexual health education, risk reduction counselling, and promotion of dual prevention interventions. These interventions are crucial to balancing and maximising PrEP's benefits while mitigating potential risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42560634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.