ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Clinical Research on Microecological Landscape for Infection Risk Stratification in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Hematological Conditions.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInfection is a common and potentially fatal complication during the treatment of hematological diseases, particularly in the context of chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression. The nonselective use of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia in China has persistently accelerated antimicrobial resistance. Early identification of patients at high risk for infection before clinical symptom onset could enable targeted preventive strategies; however, reliable and biologically informed screening approaches remain limited.
methodsWe developed a prediction model for infection risk stratification in newly diagnosed patients with hematological conditions. Plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing was performed in a prospective cohort of 230 patients. Among them, 116 patients provided prechemotherapy, non-neutropenic plasma samples (cohort A), and 114 patients provided postchemotherapy, neutropenic samples (cohort B). Microbial community profiles were analyzed, and machine learning approaches were applied to construct classifiers for neutropenia status and subsequent infection risk.
resultsPlasma metagenomic profiling revealed a complex microecological landscape in patients with hematological conditions and identified distinct microbial features associated with neutropenia. A trained random forest classifier successfully distinguished patients without neutropenia from patients with neutropenia, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8324. Importantly, a microorganism-based random forest model was established to predict patients at high risk of infection, yielding an area under the curve of 0.942. Nested cross-validation demonstrated high classification accuracy, correctly identifying 99.1% of patients who subsequently developed infections and 72.7% of patients who remained infection-free. Furthermore, integration of microbial features with clinical metrics improved predictive performance, resulting in an area under the curve of 0.953.
conclusionsThis microorganism-based prediction model provides an effective tool for infection risk stratification in patients with hematological conditions. By enabling early identification of high-risk individuals, the model has potential clinical utility for guiding precise preventive interventions and optimizing infection management strategies, which can significantly reduce the use of prophylactic antibiotics, thereby mitigating the development of resistance. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100042992.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.