ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Unexpected doornail hilar lymph nodes during robot-assisted pulmonary resection: intraoperative challenges and management strategies.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hilar lymph nodes with dense adhesion to the bronchus and pulmonary artery ("doornail" nodes) can be encountered unexpectedly during robot-assisted pulmonary resection. We report our experience managing these nodes and associated factors. This retrospective single-center cohort study included 1,185 patients undergoing robot-assisted pulmonary resection (March 2021-September 2024). Preoperative factors were analyzed using Firth penalized logistic regression in a clinically selected model (age, maximal voluntary ventilation [MVV], and tumor diameter). Operative time and blood loss were compared using robust regression models. Perioperative outcomes were compared descriptively between attempted separate dissection and en bloc stapling. Doornail hilar lymph nodes occurred in 48 of 1,185 patients (4.05%; 95% CI, 3.07-5.33%). Older age remained associated with this finding after adjusting for MVV and tumor diameter (adjusted OR per 10 years, 2.316; 95% CI, 1.533-3.596; P<0.001). Operative time was longer unadjusted (105 vs 92 min; P=0.027) but not after adjustment. Among these 48 patients, 45 (93.8%) received en bloc stapling with no blood loss exceeding 200 mL, transfusion, or prespecified in-hospital complication, whereas all 3 (6.3%) who underwent attempted separate dissection had substantial bleeding (700-2,400 mL), and 2 required transfusion. No conversion to thoracotomy occurred. Doornail hilar lymph nodes occurred in about 4% of patients; older age remained associated with this finding after adjusting for MVV and tumor diameter. Because strategy selection was non-random and groups differed in resection extent, comparative safety cannot be established; en bloc stapling after tissue thinning may be feasible when a node cannot be safely separated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42560620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.