ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Computed tomography as a tool in the analysis of dentomaxillofacial characteristics for human identification: A bibliometric analysis of the most cited publications.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography has become an important tool in human identification, supporting comparative and reconstructive approaches. This study aimed to analyze the scientific literature on the use of computed tomography in human identification, focusing on publication trends, collaboration networks, and key themes to understand the field's evolution. A bibliometric review was conducted following the Guideline for Reporting Bibliometric Reviews of the Biomedical Literature (BIBLIO). An electronic search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection. Records were ranked by citation count, and the most-cited articles were screened. Extracted data comprised authorship, country, publication year, journal, impact factor, study design, institution, keywords, citations, and research topic. Reviewer agreement was assessed with the Kappa coefficient (κ ≥ 0.81). Bibliometric analyses were performed in Power BI, and Spearman's correlation was used to test associations between citation counts, journal impact factor, and year of publication. Scientific production increased from 2015 onwards. Most studies were observational, concentrating on age and sex estimation. A methodological shift was observed with the progressive introduction of artificial intelligence. Japan had the highest citation impact. Gifu University showed the highest citations per article, and Unicamp was the most productive institution. No significant association was identified between impact factor and citations. The results confirmed computed tomography as a strategic tool in forensic sciences, especially when combined with artificial intelligence. This study offers insights into the interface between radiology and forensics and paves the way for expanding the applicability of image-based human identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42560610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.