ArticleEnvironmental management2026
An International Survey of Cyanobacteria Risk Management in Recreational Waters: Methods, Principal Taxa and Toxins, Challenges and Perspectives.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
World Health Organization (WHO) guidance on the management of cyanobacteria in recreational waters provides a comprehensive framework for reducing human health risks. To provide a global overview of how cyanobacterial risks in recreational waters are managed and to better understand capacity gaps and best practice, we surveyed expert opinion across the world. A total of 161 survey responses were collected from 49 countries. Results indicate widespread variation in the extent of recreational water monitoring. Routine monitoring often varies by region in larger, more populous countries, while seasonal monitoring, typically conducted at variable intervals, was the most used approach. Approximately half of the countries reported either a lack of routine monitoring or a combination of different monitoring patterns. Notably, whereas nearly all countries reported methods for planktonic sampling, only one-third of countries reported methods for benthic sampling. Globally, we conclude that the assessment and management of benthic cyanobacteria risks lag behind that of planktonic cyanobacteria risks. Cell counts and pigments were the most common assessment techniques for planktonic cyanobacteria. Microcystis and Oscillatoria were the most frequently reported problematic genus of planktonic and benthic cyanobacteria, respectively, and microcystins were the most frequently reported cyanotoxins of concern. A wide variety of management responses and risk communication methods were reported with the primary action trigger being the presence of cyanobacterial scums. Experts across the world were mostly unsatisfied with recreational water risk management regimes, with over 80% of respondents desiring change in how cyanobacterial risks are managed. We conclude that a renewed international effort is needed to enhance collaboration and knowledge exchange and sustain investment to ensure safer recreational waters at a global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.