ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Invasive lobular breast cancer in young patients without adjuvant systemic treatment: 15-year survival outcomes.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast typically affects older women. As a result, there is limited research on prognosis and prognostic factors in young women with ILC. Here we set out to determine the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of women under 40 years of age with lymph node-negative (N0), hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) ILC who did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment (chemo- and/or endocrine therapy).
methodsThrough the Netherlands Cancer Registry we selected all systemically untreated patients younger than 40 years with HR+/HER2-, N0, early breast cancer diagnosed in the Netherlands from 1989-2000. At the time, node-negativity was considered a favorable prognostic marker and guidelines recommended no adjuvant systemic therapy for this subgroup. Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the STEEP criteria. Uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess prognosis, calculating hazard ratios (HR) with confidence interval (CI).
resultsOf the n = 1138 selected patients, n = 95 were histologically classified as ILC and n = 805 as invasive breast cancer of no special type (BC-NST), n = 238 were classified as other breast cancer subtype. In ILC, tumor grade was not associated with DRFS/RFS or OS (HR for DRFS 1.40, 95%CI 0.42-4.63). However, the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (adjusted HR DRFS 2.81, 95%CI 1.14-6.94, p < 0.05) and multifocality (adjusted HR DRFS 3.28, 95%CI 1.49-7.22, p < 0.01) were. When comparing DRFS, RFS and OS in matched low-risk luminal A-like ILC vs. BC-NST, we observed a trend for worse 15-year survival in ILC (15-year DRFS 63% in ILC vs. 74% in BC-NST; HR 1.50, 95%CI 0.98-2.29, p = 0.06).
conclusionIn these young patients with systemically untreated N0 ILC we show that grade was not prognostic at 15 years follow-up, whereas LVI and multifocality were. Furthermore, ILC had a numerically worse 15-year survival than matched luminal A-like BC-NST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.