Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560549›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Fish cell lines in aquaculture and biomedical research: A global perspective on development, repositories, and multidisciplinary applications.

Anand Kumar, Bhartendu Vimal, Vikash Kumar, Sudeshna Sarker, Pushpa Kumari, Tapas Paul, Ajaya Kumar Rout, Ved Prakash Saini, Pramod Kumar Pandey, Bijay Kumar Behera and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anand KumarCollege of Fisheries (Kishanganj), Bihar Animal Science University, 800014, Patna, Bihar, India.
Bhartendu VimalCollege of Fisheries (Kishanganj), Bihar Animal Science University, 800014, Patna, Bihar, India. bhartenduvimal1@gmail.com.
Vikash KumarICAR - Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, West Bengal, 700 120, Barrackpore, Kolkata, India.
Sudeshna SarkerCollege of Fisheries (Kishanganj), Bihar Animal Science University, 800014, Patna, Bihar, India.
Pushpa KumariCollege of Fisheries (Kishanganj), Bihar Animal Science University, 800014, Patna, Bihar, India.
Tapas PaulCollege of Fisheries (Kishanganj), Bihar Animal Science University, 800014, Patna, Bihar, India.
Ajaya Kumar RoutCollege of Fisheries (Datia), Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ved Prakash SainiCollege of Fisheries (Kishanganj), Bihar Animal Science University, 800014, Patna, Bihar, India.
Pramod Kumar PandeyCollege of Fisheries (Datia), Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Bijay Kumar BeheraDepartment of Fisheries, National Fisheries Development Board, Government of India, Hyderabad, 500052, Telangana, India. beherabk18@yahoo.co.in.
Anuj TyagiCollege of Fisheries (Datia), Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi, 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India. anujtyaagi@yahoo.co.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish cell lines are indispensable in vitro systems that support diverse research areas, including virology, immunology, ecotoxicology, and biomedical science. Fish represent the most species-rich vertebrate group with remarkable genomic diversity, providing valuable resources for specialised cellular models. Since the establishment of the first fish cell line (RTG-2) in 1962, the global repository has expanded to approximately 918 authenticated cell lines derived from over 211 species. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the historical progression, global repositories, and current standards for cell line authentication. It summarises methodological advances in primary culture initiation, the development of continuous cell lines, and improvements in cryopreservation techniques. This review also critically explains the wide-ranging applications of fish cell lines in aquatic virology, vaccine development, and standardised ecotoxicological assays. The translational potential in biomedical research is also highlighted, particularly in cancer biology, regenerative medicine, and drug discovery, largely driven by the use of genetically tractable model species such as zebrafish (Danio rerio) and medaka (Oryzias latipes). Key challenges are also discussed, including mycoplasma contamination, cross-species misidentification, limitations in cryopreservation protocols for marine-derived cells, and the need for robust, open-access digital biobanking systems. Future perspectives encompass emerging technologies such as 3D organoids, organ-on-a-chip platforms, CRISPR-based genome editing, and serum-free culture systems. Integration of these innovations with omics approaches and adverse outcome pathway frameworks is expected to enhance the utility of fish cell lines, advancing research in aquaculture, environmental monitoring, and food security, while aligning with the principles of the 3Rs and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Indexed as

AquacultureBiomedical ResearchFishesAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCryopreservationAquacultureBiomedical researchCRISPREcotoxicologyFish cell linesVirology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.