ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
The effectiveness of polarized versus high-intensity training in moderately trained cyclists: a randomized parallel-design study.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePolarized training intensity distribution (POL) typically involves 80% of endurance training volume to be spent in the Moderate intensity domain (MOD) and 20% to be in the Severe intensity domain-commonly performed as high-intensity interval training (HIIT). POL is popular in all endurance sports, but the independent contributions of MOD vs. HIIT on performance outcomes have not been experimentally tested. We therefore sought to compare training adaptions following HIIT with (POL) and without (HIIT) the addition of MOD cycling in moderately-trained endurance athletes.
methodsNineteen cyclists and triathletes (17 men) were recruited and randomly allocated to 3 days/week of HIIT with (POL) or without (HIIT) an additional 240 min/week of MOD cycling for 6 weeks. Time trial (TT) performance, peak work rate (WR
resultsBoth groups reduced their TT time by an average of 8.5 ± 1.2%. Despite the POL group performing ~ 23 more hours of training across 6 weeks, we did not observe any time*group interactions in TT performance, WR
conclusionsWe conclude that the addition of MOD training to a HIIT program does not yield further improvements in performance over a 6-week period. Performance improvements in a moderately trained population following 6 weeks of training appear to be driven primarily by the Severe-intensity component of training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42560532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.