Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560522›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in unimodal and crossmodal isochronous sequences.

Min Susan Li, Massimiliano Di Luca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min Susan LiSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Massimiliano Di LucaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. m.diluca@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-7251

Funding

EPSRC EP/V034987/1FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions, European Union 304235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal judgments depend on sequence regularity and on the sensory modality in which events occur. We asked whether modality-specific sequence history and across-trial modality context make distinct contributions to temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in isochrony judgments. Participants judged whether the sixth event in a six-item sequence occurred earlier or later than expected. The first five events were auditory or visual; the final event either matched this modality or switched modality. The four sequence types were presented either in separate blocks or randomly interleaved across trials; this manipulation is referred to as presentation mode. Temporal sensitivity, indexed by the just noticeable difference (JND), was better for auditory than for visual sequences and better for modality-consistent than for modality-inconsistent sequences. Effects involving presentation mode were treated as descriptive because this factor was between participants and confounded with hardware settings. Perceived timing, indexed by the point of subjective equality (PSE), showed large shifts for modality-switch endings in the interleaved group. The results support a dissociation between sequence-related effects on temporal sensitivity and context-dependent biases in perceived timing.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionJudgmentTime PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultCrossmodal timingIsochronyModality expectationPerceptual timingTemporal sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID42560522
PMCPMC13447548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.