ArticleMycorrhiza2026
Improved growth and antioxidant responses via arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated changes in phenolic compounds in two tomato landraces under salt stress.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve plant performance under salinity, but their contribution to phenolic-based antioxidant responses in traditional tomato landraces remains unclear. We evaluated the effects of Diversispora celata and Funneliformis mosseae on growth, nutrition, gas exchange, oxidative status, and phenolic metabolism in Chilean tomato landraces Limachino and Maulino (Solanum lycopersicum L.) exposed to 0 or 150 mM NaCl. A 3 × 2 × 2 design included three inoculation treatments, two salinity levels, two landraces, and four replicates per combination. Biomass, shoot N and P contents, gas exchange, pigments, proline, lipid peroxidation, antioxidant capacity, and individual phenolics were quantified. Salinity reduced biomass, shoot N and P contents, and net photosynthesis, while non-mycorrhizal plants showed the highest lipid peroxidation. Responses depended on landrace and fungal identity. Under salinity, D. celata-inoculated Limachino plants showed higher biomass, shoot N content, and net photosynthesis than non-mycorrhizal plants, together with greater proline accumulation, higher concentrations of several hydroxycinnamic acids, anthocyanins, quercetin derivatives, total phenolics, and antioxidant capacity, and lower lipid peroxidation. In Maulino, both isolates improved gas exchange; F. mosseae was more closely associated with photosynthetic pigments and TEAC/DPPH capacity, and D. celata with phenolic derivatives and CUPRAC capacity. Overall, AMF responses depended on the host-fungus combination, with phenolic-associated non-enzymatic antioxidant responses emerging as a prominent feature of the Limachino-D. celata association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42560394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.