Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42560392›Full record

ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026

Impact of clinical pharmacist-led interventions on denosumab adherence.

Anna Zuschnitt, Erin Lightheart, Jennifer Myers, Amna Nabeel Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna ZuschnittAmbulatory Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Endocrinology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Erin LightheartDepartment of Quality and Safety, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jennifer MyersClinical Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, Leonard Davis Institute, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Maloney Building, Suite 5003, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Amna Nabeel KhanClinical Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, USA. Amna.Khan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacist-led interventions significantly improved denosumab adherence in patients with osteoporosis at an academic medical center, reducing non-adherence from 20.8 to 4.9%. This quality improvement initiative included pharmacist-led medication counseling and laboratory monitoring, highlighting the effectiveness of pharmacist-physician collaboration in preventing rebound-associated vertebral fractures and enhancing patient outcomes.

backgroundInterrupting or delaying denosumab beyond 7 months (210 days) from the last injection leads to transient increase in bone turnover known as rebound phenomenon, resulting in rapid loss of bone density and increased risk of vertebral fracture(s), now known as rebound-associated vertebral fractures (RAVF). Numerous studies suggest that clinical pharmacist participation in chronic disease state management leads to an increase in medication adherence and positive clinical outcomes. We evaluated the impact of a clinical pharmacist intervention on adherence to optimal denosumab timing for patients with osteoporosis.

methodsThe model for improvement was used to design and evaluate this quality improvement project. This study analyzed 143 patients receiving denosumab therapy in an osteoporosis clinic every 6 months for the indication of osteoporosis. At baseline, 21% of patients receiving denosumab did not receive the medication at optimal time intervals for clinical effectiveness. An administration was considered correct or on time if denosumab was given within 210 days of the last injection received. If the injection was given outside this window, it was considered incorrect administration. The incidence of correct and incorrect administrations was gathered to calculate the non-adherence rate. Clinical pharmacist interventions included patient counseling and electronic dosing reminders and phone calls. The aim of this study was to reduce the nonadherence rate from 20.8% to less than 5.0% by July 31, 2023.

resultsWith these interventions, the number of correct administrations between incorrect administrations improved from an average of 3.3 to 13.1. These effects became visible about 10 weeks after the second intervention and correspond to a reduction in nonadherence rate from 20.8 to 4.9% by July 31, 2023.

conclusionsPharmacist-physician collaboration can reduce the nonadherence rate for drugs such as denosumab, interruption of which can result in serious consequences.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDrug MonitoringMedication AdherenceOsteoporosisPharmacistsAdherence InterventionsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabAdherenceClinical pharmacistDenosumab (D Mab)Osteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42560392
PMCPMC13447343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.