ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Digital engagement and adolescent wellbeing: insights from the UK millennium cohort study.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing research on screen time and adolescent psychological wellbeing often overlooks how digital engagement interacts with other daily activities. Uncertainty remains about which activities are complemented or displaced by digital use, and whether specific combinations of activities are beneficial or detrimental to wellbeing. We used detailed time-use diary data from 3,288 participants in the UK Millennium Cohort Study, collected during the age-14 survey. Adolescents recorded their activities in 144 consecutive 10-min slots over a 24‑h period, selecting from 44 pre-specified activity types. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct time-use patterns. This approach accounts for the interdependence and trade-offs among different activities, rather than examining each of them in isolation. Associations between these profiles and later psychological wellbeing, measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Three time-use profiles emerged: (i) 'Frequent digital users' (21.0%), with high digital engagement, especially gaming, more common among males and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, showing poorer psychological wellbeing; (ii) 'Physically active, moderate digital users' (59.7%), who balanced digital and non-digital activities with high physical activity, showing more favourable psychological wellbeing; and (iii) 'In-person socialisers, low digital users' (19.3%), with low digital use and high face-to-face interaction, showing intermediate level of psychological wellbeing. Findings suggest that a balanced mix of daily activities is associated with more favourable adolescent wellbeing, highlighting the importance of promoting overall activity balance rather than focusing on digital time alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.